The Political Capability Regarding the Urgency of Compulsion in Law Number 6 of 2023 Concerning Job Creation Post Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020: A Siyasah Dasturiyah Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/proceedingsoficresh.v3i.19Keywords:
urgency, Job Creation PERPPU, emergency, siyasah dasturiyahAbstract
The Job Creation Law is the first regulation in Indonesia to use the omnibus law method, leading to formal defects because the government enforced an omnibus law approach, typically used in common law/Anglo-Saxon systems, within Indonesia's continental European legal system. Consequently, the Job Creation Law underwent a formal judicial review by the Constitutional Court. On November 25, 2021, the Constitutional Court issued Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, declaring the Job Creation Law conditionally unconstitutional. The formation of this law was a governmental response to the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, replacing Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. From the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah (constitutional politics), the government has the authority to issue government regulations in lieu of laws (PERPPU). The government is permitted to issue a PERPPU in emergency situations that are unforeseen and cannot be anticipated. Moreover, there are three conditions that justify the issuance of a PERPPU: jihad, bughat, and hirabah. However, the formulation of the Job Creation PERPPU, considering the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, allowed a period of two years, which does not meet the emergency conditions in Islam.
References
Azhara, Melisa Ayu, and Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah. “Partisipasi Publik Dalam Penyusunan Dokumen Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang/Perppu Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 30, no. 2 (2023): 142. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art2.
Fadhilah, Mursal, Iskandar Zulkarnain, Yenny Febrianty, and Mahifal Mahifal. “Dampak Pemberlakuan UU Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 54/PUU-XXI/2023 Ditinjau Dari Sosiologi Hukum.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 7, No. 9 (2023): 15273. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i9.14251.
Fatmawati. Fikih Siyasah. makasar: Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin, 2023.
Guswara, Arrafi Bima, and Ali Imran Nasution. “Dinamika Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Dan 54/PUU-XXI/2023.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 3 (2023): 1058. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7844.
Hamzah, Nur Asia. “Darurat Membolehkan Yang Dilarang.” JURNAL PILAR: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer 11, no. 2 (2020): 27–37.
Handayani, Tri. “Alternatif Penegakan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Iqtisad 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v4i1.1996.
Hasdinar. “Implikasi Putusan Mk Nomor 91/Puuxviii/2020 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Tentang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Legislatif 6, no. 1 (2020): 50–64.
Ibrahim, Duski. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyyah (Kaidah-Kaidah Fiqih). Palembang: CV. Amanah, 2019.
Iqbal, Muhammad. Fiqih Siyasah. Jakarta: Prenamedia Kencana, 2014.
Khatimah, Husnul, and Syarifuddin. “Darurat & Realisasinya.” Jurnal Lisan Al-Hal 8, no. 2 (2014): 227–45.
Lubis, Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani. Ilmu Hukum Dalam Simpul Siyasah Dusturiyah Refleksi Atas Teori Dan Praktek Hukum Tata Negara Di Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. Vol. 53, 2019.
———. “Ilmu Hukum Dalam Simpul Siyasah Dusturiyah Refleksi Atas Teori Dan Praktek Hukum Tata Negara Di Indonesia.” In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53:1–222. Yogyakarta: Semesta Aksara, 2019.
Mahrida, Hamzah Kamma, Moh. Mujibur Rohman, Mohammad Hendy Musthofa Muhammadong M Aris Rofiqi Fauzi, Syamsiah Nur Kaslam Tamrin, Ulfatun Wahidatun Nisa Thoat Stiawan, and Alkausar Saragih. FIQH SIYASAH ( Simpul Politik Islam Dalam Membentuk Negara Madani ). Kota Solok: PT Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia, 2023.
Nahas, Maria Pricilia Rahmawati, and Ahmad Junaidi. “Partisipasi Publik Pada Postingan Instagram @narasinewsroom Terkait UU Ciptaker.” Koneksi 8, no. 1 (2024): 255. https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v8i1.27687.
Nasrudin. “Tinjauan YURIdis Terhadap Ketentuan PasaL 22 Ayat (1) UUD 1945 Tentang Hal Ihwal Kegentingan Yang Memaksa Sebagai Syarat Penerbitan PERPPU.” ‘adliya 9, no. 1 (2015).
Nuh, Muhammad Syarif. “Hakekat Keadaan Darurat Negara (State of Emergency) Sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 18, no. 2 (2011): 229–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art5.
Nurhakim, Agus. “Konsep Darurat Dalam Hukum Ketatanegaraan Islam.” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 8, no. 1 (2020): 236–46.
Suhardin, Yohanes, and Henny Saida Flora. “Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Penetapan Perpu Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 329. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6307.
Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. “Constitutional Disobedience Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Kajian Terhadap Perppu Cipta Kerja.” Constitution Journal 2, no. 1 (2023): 63. https://doi.org/10.35719/constitution.v2i1.50.
Syarifin, Pipin, and Debah Jubaedah. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Bandung: CV pustaka setia, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurhikma, Risma Aldani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
