Framing the Trans7 Boycott within Digital Ethics and Santri Community Resistance to Mainstream Media Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/proceedingsoficresh.v4i.78Keywords:
Media Framing, Digital Ethics, Pesantren, Santri Resistance, Islamic CommunicationAbstract
The Trans7 boycott phenomenon, triggered by the television program Xpose Uncensored, illustrates the tension between mainstream media representation and the cultural sensitivity of Islamic boarding schools (pesantren). The broadcast portrayed the kiai–santri relationship as a form of social inequality, which subsequently generated public criticism and digital resistance movements among the santri community. This study aims to examine the construction of media framing, identify violations of digital ethics, and analyze the forms of resistance undertaken by pesantren communities against dominant media narratives. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach within a constructivist paradigm, the analysis draws on Robert M. Entman’s framing model and Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. Data were collected from the Xpose Uncensored broadcast, online news coverage, social media content, and in-depth interviews with santri, kiai, and media activists, with validity ensured through source triangulation. The findings reveal that Trans7 framed pesantren culture in a reductive and biased manner by emphasizing narratives of social inequality while neglecting the contextual meaning of ta’dzim (respect and reverence) embedded in pesantren traditions. Such framing constitutes violations of key principles of digital ethics, particularly accountability, cultural sensitivity, and participatory verification. In response, the santri community engaged in digital resistance through hashtag campaigns, public clarifications, and the production of counter-narrative content that reaffirmed the ethical and spiritual significance of respect within pesantren culture. This movement represents a form of semiotic resistance and an expression of Islamic value-based digital literacy. These findings resonate with cultural resistance theory and Habermas’s concept of the digital public sphere. The study underscores that biased media framing and weak cultural sensitivity can provoke constructive religious resistance, while highlighting the need for a model of digital ethics grounded in Islamic values and Indonesia’s cultural pluralism.
References
Ali, Y. (2024). Postcolonial Theory and Cultural Resistance: Recovering Voice and Mind. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59992/ijesa.2024.v3n1p3
Arifin, Z., & Nurul Anam. (2023). Pemberdayaan Komunitas Santri Kitab Kuning di Pondok Pesantren. Al-Ijtimā: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.53515/aijpkm.v4i1.85
Baskoro, L. R. (2021). Kekerasan Terhadap Pers dan Perlindungannya. Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.58823/jham.v7i7.67
Bella, S., & Ogiermann, E. (2019). An Intergenerational Perspective on (Im)politeness. In Journal of Politeness Research (Vol. 15, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0033
Bustamam, R., & Hardivizon, H. (2025). Implementing The Values Of Raḥmatan Li Al-‘Ālamīn Through Maqāṣid-Based Exegesis To Achieve Social Justice. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24014/Jush.v33i1.35703
Clarke, E., DeNora, T., & Vuoskoski, J. (2015). Music, empathy and cultural understanding. In Physics of Life Reviews (Vol. 15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.001
Creswell, J W. (2003). Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954
Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd Edition). In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
Dawud, M., & Choliq, M.I.Kom, A. (2020). Manajemen Strategi Ala NU Tv 9 Menghadapi Televisi Swasta Lokal di Surabaya. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.35719/alhikmah.v18i1.24
Dörr, K. N., & Hollnbuchner, K. (2017). Ethical Challenges of Algorithmic Journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1167612
Efendi, E., Siregar, F., & Damanik, K. (2023). Format Acara Dakwah Efektif di Radio dan TV. Journal on Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1726
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Erakini.id. (2025). Gerakan Boikot Trans7: Ketika Media Massa Gagal Memahami Realitas Pesantren. https://www.erakini.id/gagas/era-3BOdS/gerakan-boikot-trans7–ketika-media-massa-gagal-memahami-realitas-pesantren
Ess, C. (2017). Digital Media Ethics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.508
Ess, C. (2021). Book Review: Media Ethics and Global Justice in the Digital Age. New Media & Society, 23(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821999814
Ess, C. M. (2017). Can we say anything ethical about Digital Religion? Philosophical and methodological considerations. New Media and Society, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649914
Fahmi, M. (2016). Radikalisme Islam dalam Representasi Media di Thailand. Al-Ulum, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v16i2.159
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
Fernandes, J. V. (1988). From the Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction to the Theory of Resistance. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569880090203
Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
Hall, S. (2020). The work of representation. In The Applied Theatre Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429355363-15
Hashimov, E. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Haugh, M. (2024). (Im)politeness as object, (im)politeness as perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0082
Hefni, H. (2016). Pengaruh Komunikasi dalam Kehidupan Perspektif Al-Quran dan Hadis. Al-Hikmah, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24260/al-hikmah.v10i2.612
Hefni, H. (2017). Makna dan Aktualisasi Dakwah Islam Rahmatan lil‘Alamin di Indonesia. Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v11i1.1438
Heryanto, G. G. (2017). Ekonomi Politik Media Penyiaran: Rivalitas Idealisme Nilai Islami dan Mekanisme Pasar. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v1i1.1212
Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture & Society, 38(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715615412
Hudayana, B. (2021). Pengembangan Seni-Budaya sebagai Penguatan Identitas Komunitas Kejawen dan Santri di Desa pada Era Reformasi. Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya Dan Perubahan Sosial, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v5i1.15641
Hutabarat, E., Situmeang, A., & Girsang, J. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pasal 15 Undang-undang Pers terhadap Fungsi dan Kewenangan Dewan Pers dalam Mencegah Berita Bohong. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2023.26.1.57-70
Islami.co. (2025). Mitos Feodalisme Pesantren: Kritik atas Framing Media dan Komentar Negatif Netizen. https://islami.co/mitos-feodalisme-pesantren-kritik-atas-framing-media-dan-komentar-negatif-netizen/
Isyroofanaa, E., Faizah, Z., & Utomo, M. T. (2021). Pengaruh Paparan Media Massa Terhadap Literasi Kesehatan Reproduksi Remaja Pondok Pesantren. Indonesian Midwifery and Health Sciences Journal, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.20473/imhsj.v3i4.2019.341-348
Jurnal9.tv. (2025). Melihat Tradisi Pesantren dalam Gelombang #BoikotTrans7. https://jurnal9.tv/melihat-tradisi-pesantren-dalam-gelombang-boikottrans7/
Kurniawati, L. (2019). Implikasi standar program siaran pada tayangan edukasi dan artistik TVRI Jawa Barat. ProTVF, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/ptvf.v3i2.23008
Laws, A. L. S., & Utne, T. (2019). Ethics guidelines for immersive journalism. Frontiers Robotics AI, 6(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00028
Lotto, L. S. (1986). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737008003329
Manita, R. J., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Enhancing Community Reading Interest through Mentoring the Management of Batubasa Nagari Library. Mangabdi: Journal of Community Engagement in Religion, Social, and Humanities, 1(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.31958/mangabdi.v1i1.13229
Martino, W., Omercajic, K., & Cumming-Potvin, W. (2021). YouTube as a site of desubjugation for trans and nonbinary youth: pedagogical potentialities and the limits of whiteness. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1912156
Masykuroh, W. R., & Jannah, R. (2018). Social Construction of Hafidzah Al Qur’an in Jember District. Jurnal ENTITAS SOSIOLOGI, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.19184/jes.v7i1.16636
Mccombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McConnell, S. (2022). Journalism ethics in a populist age. In Populism, the Pandemic and the Media: Journalism in the age of Covid, Trump, Brexit and Johnson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003253822-47
Munawarah, M. (2021). Revitalisasi Prinsip Tabayyun dan Qaula Sadida. Syams: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.23971/js.v2i2.3868
Pamungkas, A. S., & Octaviani, G. (2017). Aksi Bela Islam dan Ruang Publik Muslim: Dari Representasi Daring ke Komunitas Luring. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i2.28581
Pojok Satu Sulsel. (2025). Boikot Trans7: Pelajaran dari Persimpangan Media, Agama, dan Identitas Pesantren. https://sulsel.pojoksatu.id/insight/1146704790/boikot-trans7-pelajaran-dari-persimpangan-media-agama-dan-identitas-pesantren
Putri, C. N., Dava Putra Anandya, & Arrayan Prawira Hardinata. (2024). Pelanggaran Etika dan Hukum Penyiaran dalam Program Siaran 86 NET TV. Jurnal Audiens, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v4i4.263
Rambaree, K., Nässén, N., Holmberg, J., & Fransson, G. (2023). Enhancing Cultural Empathy in International Social Work Education through Virtual Reality. Education Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050507
Roberts, J. (2019). The erosion of ethics: from citizen journalism to social media. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2019-0014
Rozehnal, A. (2022). Digital Media Ethics. Law, Identity and Values, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55073/2022.1.161-173
Sari, N. K., & Syas, M. (2023). Praktik Hegemoni Media Atas Isu Boikot Produk Prancis pada Grup Trans Media. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v20i1.8
Scheufele, B. (2022). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. In Schlüsselwerke: Theorien (in) der Kommunikationswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37354-2_8
Setyawan, A., Yuwono, P. S. H., & Wahid, A. (2021). Santri, Cigarettes, and Power Relation: Soft Constructivism of Smoking Habit at Pesantren Lirboyo. MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial, 4(01).
Weissenrieder, M., & Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/329335
Yahya, Y. K., Untung, S. H., & Fajari, I. A. (2020). Da’wah di Youtube: Upaya Representasi Nilai Islam oleh Para Content-Creator. Anida (Aktualisasi Nuansa Ilmu Dakwah), 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/anida.v20i1.8888
Yeti Andrias, M., Tuharea, F., Aituru, Y. P., Irsan, I., & Apripari, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hak Jurnalis Terkait Ujaran Kebencian dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Al-Mizan, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v19i1.3449
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Salman Faird, Marlina Marlina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
